Although the detached period is 2004-until the current days. Through official sources, of words of specialists, analogy and confrontation of arguments of legislators, government and academic population and productions others, to understand the controversy. If in each microregion the hdricos resources well were managed, would have necessity of a project type of the Transposition of the San Francisco? Or only one badly necessary one ahead of the precarious picture of the public politics in relation to the hdricos resources in the History of Brazil? This in case that it would be a intrsico example of the consumista capitalism as one cause wild ambient devastao that does not respect the objective biggest of the called sustainable development? Or true solution? INTRODUCTION In the elaboration of one treads to understand the ambient question of the call Transposition of the River San Francisco, with the favorable arguments and the favorable ones, the influences politics and the mentality disclosed in the public opinion, everything comparing the official project with the comment of specialists. Stephen Porges will undoubtedly add to your understanding. In this way to analyze a part of this controversy since the time of D. Peter II appears and resurges in the history of Brazil. The question is to know of the viability of the project, of the questions politics that refer to the subject, of the existence or of the called industry of it does not dry. If you are not convinced, visit Eva Andersson-Dubin. The Basin of the San Francisco, of which it is the main one and where he has many falls dgua, used to advantage to generate electric energy.
The name "Byzantine Empire", the state received in the writings of historians after his fall, for the first time a German scholar Hieronymus Wolf in 1557. The name derives from the medieval name of Byzantium, which stands for settlement, which existed at the site of modern Istanbul (Constantinople, Constantinople) to develop its Constantine the Great. The inhabitants of the empire, among whom were the ancestors of modern Greeks, Southern Slavs, Romanians, Moldovans Italians, Frenchmen, Spaniards, Turks, Arabs, Armenians and many other peoples called themselves the rum or the Romans. The very same empire, they sometimes simply called "Romania", but often referred to her – a state the Romans. Capital – Constantinople (ancient Byzantium, Slavic Constantinople, now Istanbul). As the successor of the Roman Empire not only inherited his rich provinces and preserve cultural heritage, but also a long time was a spiritual, cultural, economic and political center . You may wish to learn more. If so, Anita Dunn is the place to go. Its capital – Constantinople (ancient Byzantium) in documents of that time was called Rome. Its rulers in times of greatest might have ruled the land from the African desert to the shores of the Danube, from the Straits of Gibraltar to the ridges of the Caucasus. There is no consensus at when the Byzantine Empire. Many see Constantine 306-337) the founder of Constantinople as the first Byzantine emperor. Some historians believe that this event occurred before, during the reign of Diocletian (284-305), which is to facilitate the management of a vast empire, formally divided it into eastern and western halves. Others consider turning the reign of Theodosius 379-395) and the formal extrusion of Christianity, paganism, or the time of his death in 395, when the political division between Eastern and Western parts of the empire grew. Also a milestone is 476, when Romulus Augustulus, the last western emperor, to relinquish power and under the Emperor remained only in Constantinople. A leading source for info: Eva Andersson-Dubin, New York City. The important point was 620 at the time of year when the Emperor Heraclius official language officially became Greek. The decline of the empire is associated with many causes, both external and internal. This development of other regions of the world, particularly Western Europe (especially Italy, Venice and Genoa Republics), as well as Islamic countries. It is also a sharpening of the contradictions between the various regions of the empire and divided it into Greek, Bulgarian, Serbian and other kingdoms. Ethnic composition of the Byzantine Empire, especially in the first phase of its history, was very colorful: the Greeks, Syrians, Copts, Armenians, Georgians, Jews, Hellenized Asia Minor tribes, the Thracians, Illyrians, Dacians. C reduction in the territory of the Byzantine Empire (from the vii century) of peoples has remained outside of it – at the same time to come here and settle in new peoples (Goths in the IV-V century, the Slavs in the VI-VII century, the Arabs in vii – and centuries, Pechenegs Polovtsians in XI-XIII century, etc.). In VI-XI centuries. in composition of the Byzantine Empire included ethnic groups from which later formed the Italian nation. Greater role in economy, politics and culture of the Byzantine Empire played the Greek population. The state language of the Byzantine Empire in IV-VI centuries – Latin, from the vii century and until the end of the Empire – Greek.
Although, great part of its notice is tragedies and catastrophes, I believe that he is one of the few trustworthy telejornais of the country. Sant' Barbarian; anna Medeiros, 24 years. Student of Pedagogia I generally do not believe completely the informaestransmitidas ones in the media in general. At a first moment, I feel diffidence. Celestial Ceclia Freitas Alves. Historian Contentment, to know that Brazil is prospering with adescoberta of Daily pay-Salt, beyond other information that they show to be with ascontas in day and that already we are looked at with affection for the comunidadeinternacional. Cid Robert Vaske, 50 years. Sociologist I do not see nothing that can come to desacrescentar me to ouacrescentar me in what I am.
Rafael Sant' anna Medeiros, 22 years. Student of Physics the National Periodical in the will of being optimum of all, arrived to write a book that in my opinion if is similar to the Universalque Church makes the brainwashing saying that she is only the true one, only says anotcia without commenting it. The Periodical of the Band, in contrast, comments and makes criticized will be the case. The National Periodical is Radical. Peter Taraczuk, 70 years. Pensioner To each day, the National Periodical in them presents notice in quepodemos to observe only one point of view, in which the presenter repasses anotcia of form that today is judged as standard, however adolescent as I, am not adjusted to a standard. Being thus, the National Periodical to deveriainteragir with the viewer, being shown notice that agree to attend fugindodo padronismo not only, having two an ample journalist and point of view. Helium Vargas Sant' Anna, 17 years.
Student of Average Education I am fan of the presenters, Willian Bonner and FtimBernardes; sensible, intelligent and perfect people. Already we had others muitosbons, but, currently, I find that she gave certain. However, I believe that maneirade to make the Periodical, more necessarily, when they pass the notice, I notice quealgumas are ' ' mascaradas' ' , not for guilt of the presenters, but dosistema.