In the text of 4 sub-heading the author tells the quandary of Bolcheviques, in special Lnin, on the possibility of the success of a socialist revolution in a country of behind capitalism as Russia. As Cotrimpara Lnin this possibility was real therefore ele’ ‘ nascente.’ found viable to materialize the Socialist Revolution in capitalism countries; ‘ (Cotrim, 1986, P. Many writers such as John Craig Venter offer more in-depth analysis. 196). Still according to Cotrim ‘ ‘ Lnin saw in Russia the existence of historical conditions that allowed the ecloso of the Socialist Revolution, mainly, later that the World War I ruined the structure of being able that russo’ supported the State imperial; ‘ (1986, P. 197).
In 6 subs-heading 5 and the author analyzes, respectively, the civil war and first measured the economic ones adopted by the Bolcheviques. The dispute between Stalin and Trotski after the death of Lnin is the subject of 7 sub-heading. In this point the author analyzes in superficial way the years of ‘ ‘ Stalinismo’ ‘ , and it closes the chapter telling the death of Trotski. The English historian Eric Hobsbawm analyzes the Russian Revolution as one of the events marcantes of century XX. Differently of Gilbert Cotrim, for Hobsbawm the objective of Lnin and of the Bolcheviques was to obtain with the 1917 revolution to light estopim of world-wide the Socialist Revolution, thus affirms: () In the mind of Lnin and its comrades the victory bolchevique in Russia was basically a battle in the campaign to reach the victory of the bolchevismo in a global scale ampler, and hardly justifiable not to be as such.
(1995, P. 63) Exactly with the isolation and the civil war that was stimulated by the foreign powers Russia became a symbol for all the other peoples who fought against the hunger and the violence generated by the World War I. Hobsbawm analyzes the fact of bolcheviques, in contrast of the Liberal-bourgeois ones with Kerenski, to count on ample popular support therefore, according to Hobsbawm, bolcheviques had known to hear e, mainly, appeals to understand it the people for peace, bread and freedom.
Tags: culture History
"It is a joy, with tears in his eyes" – said about the Day of Victory poet. Indeed, in this day of joy and sorrow – next. Out of Russia family that war have been avoided. Because on this day every family to remember those who remained on the battlefields, and those who after the war, Peace life. And yet – those congratulating the soldiers of the Great Patriotic War, who live today. And there are fewer, and the youngest soldiers of the last conscription – had already seventy years.
And many veterans are growing not only grandchildren but great-grandchildren. For many of today's kids the Great Patriotic War – is almost as far back as the war with Napoleon. And there on the Russian soil young people with swastikas. And some historians are beginning to argue that it would be if it had not blocked the way the Nazis, Soviet soldiers. And they reasoned, they just stood there until recently – in Brest and Stalingrad, Kursk and siege of Leningrad. Stood – and stood up. And those who did not take to the front, forged victory in the rear. Women, replacing the retired men who built the tanks and planes, plowed and sowed, and more – raising children, saving the country's future.
That is why the Day Victory – truly a national holiday. On this day, decided to visit on the ground fighting, the monuments of military glory, on the graves of fallen soldiers. Traditionally held here laying wreaths and flowers, meetings, celebrations the passage of troops.
Although, great part of its notice is tragedies and catastrophes, I believe that he is one of the few trustworthy telejornais of the country. Sant' Barbarian; anna Medeiros, 24 years. Student of Pedagogia I generally do not believe completely the informaestransmitidas ones in the media in general. At a first moment, I feel diffidence. Celestial Ceclia Freitas Alves. Historian Contentment, to know that Brazil is prospering with adescoberta of Daily pay-Salt, beyond other information that they show to be with ascontas in day and that already we are looked at with affection for the comunidadeinternacional. Cid Robert Vaske, 50 years. Sociologist I do not see nothing that can come to desacrescentar me to ouacrescentar me in what I am.
Rafael Sant' anna Medeiros, 22 years. Student of Physics the National Periodical in the will of being optimum of all, arrived to write a book that in my opinion if is similar to the Universalque Church makes the brainwashing saying that she is only the true one, only says anotcia without commenting it. The Periodical of the Band, in contrast, comments and makes criticized will be the case. The National Periodical is Radical. Peter Taraczuk, 70 years. Pensioner To each day, the National Periodical in them presents notice in quepodemos to observe only one point of view, in which the presenter repasses anotcia of form that today is judged as standard, however adolescent as I, am not adjusted to a standard. Being thus, the National Periodical to deveriainteragir with the viewer, being shown notice that agree to attend fugindodo padronismo not only, having two an ample journalist and point of view. Helium Vargas Sant' Anna, 17 years.
Student of Average Education I am fan of the presenters, Willian Bonner and FtimBernardes; sensible, intelligent and perfect people. Already we had others muitosbons, but, currently, I find that she gave certain. However, I believe that maneirade to make the Periodical, more necessarily, when they pass the notice, I notice quealgumas are ' ' mascaradas' ' , not for guilt of the presenters, but dosistema.